In
his letter headed “A pen or a shovel?” (14/12), David De Garis artfully paints
himself as a noble, university educated man who toils away in the city for a wage
that is dwarfed by that of poorly educated, fly-in fly-out workers in the resources
industry. He asks which of the two paths a young man might follow these days.
David,
like many other people not involved in the resources industry, you have drawn
it very crudely, invoking visions of homogenous clusters of “workers” getting
on planes to “the mines” and returning with fistfuls of cash. You draw
attention to the sacrifices you made by going to university, unconscious of the
fact that many people boarding such planes are either university educated
themselves or are qualified tradesmen – and only a brave man would tell a
tradesman that he has not also made sacrifices during his four-year
apprenticeship.
So
the very basis of your letter - the idea that a university education and the
resources industry are mutually exclusive – is completely inaccurate. For thousands
of people, including myself, “pens and shovels” are interchangeable. I have a
degree and often work in the city, but I also love being hundreds of kilometres
from anywhere, covered in flies, and hitting rocks with a hammer.
Regardless
of their level of education or training, people in the resources industry take
a risk by working in what history shows is a boom-bust game. And as a
white-collar professional, I am sure you appreciate that with risk can come reward
– in this case, financial. The flipside to the reward is illustrated by events like BHP’s spectacular
failure at Ravensthorpe and the subsequent mass sackings.